Unsustainable living in St. Andrew, Jamaica

We are thinking about “downsizing.” We are getting older and we are looking for somewhere to live that is more manageable. Our quest for a new home in the parish of St. Andrew (most of which is called “uptown” by Kingston dwellers) has been what they call an “eye opener” – or, perhaps I should say, a “jaw dropper.”

From the consumer point of view, it has been a deeply disappointing experience so far. Charming townhouse complexes and attractive apartments seen on the realtors’ websites are not quite the same, close up. We find ourselves staring at wide cracks in walls, peeling paint, limp palm trees, and stagnant swimming pools that look as if they are in their death throes. And these are relatively new developments, with relatively high price tags and fancy faux foreign names. We have had to pick up our jaws off the floor several times.

Now, those cracks may be pointing to other, more deep-seated concerns about the rash of new “development”in St. Andrew. Tons and tons of concrete are being poured into relatively small spaces with soil and vegetation that once supported just one or perhaps two buildings. What is this doing to the soils of St. Andrew – especially with all the vegetation removed? Would the ground be able to support the weight of a block of fifty apartments – and how would this affect neighbouring properties? Don’t soils move? What if there is an earthquake? I should say not “if,” but “when.” We are, after all, in an earthquake zone, as the occasional tremor reminds us. This is a question for geologists, engineers, or at least for the surveyors, I suppose.

So can our already fragile environment, often subject to heavy rains, landslides, and other hazards, support such heavy developments? There is one road where the apartment buildings are packed in, cheek by jowl, in towers and turrets; no breathing space, no trees (which are collateral damage in almost every “development”) and with parking underneath the buildings (is that safe? I don’t know). In the Jacks Hill area, the slopes are unstable at the best of times; now huge high rise developments are planned or already in the making. Earthquakes, anyone?

I have more questions about sustainability, in the context of the environment and climate change. Almost all these new developments have no consideration for energy or water use. For example, most of the kitchens have dishwashers (OK, maybe you have dinner parties every night…) and the laundry rooms have dryers (in the tropics, where you can hang out washing and it is dry in half an hour?) There are also water heaters – again, expensive electric ones. This is not to mention the fact that, with the increasingly high temperatures, air conditioning becomes a must; especially if the residence is poorly designed with small windows (I have seen some that are almost prison-like) and surrounded by concrete. Those electricity bills must be high!

Fossil fuels, here we come! Don’t we import enough already?

So, what happened to solar energy (we have plenty of sunshine, right)? What happened to rainwater harvesting, recycling, and other water-saving techniques? These are not incorporated in most of the new developments, let alone the older ones. We have a solar water heater that is so effective that you can burn yourself if you are not careful, so it’s a “no-brainer” to me – but clearly not to the developers. Couldn’t they at least invest in a solar water pump for the swimming pool (providing the pool is intact)? As for water, are they just going to depend on the ubiquitous black water tanks and hope for the best? How is the water pressure in the upper floors of these monster buildings? We may well be looking at persistent, longer droughts in our future.

It seems no thought has been given to sustainability. I wonder if some of these places will even be livable in ten or twenty years’ time.

I am thinking again in the context of disaster preparedness. If there is a hurricane, how will the residents of these apartment turrets, with their wonderful views of other turrets, fare? Do these complexes have disaster preparedness plans? In the case of floods or landslides, how will those living in townhouse complexes, encased in many yards of concrete tiles and perimeter walls, manage? Are there proper drainage systems? One thing I know for sure is that concrete cannot, and will not absorb large volumes of water. And natural or man-made gullies that have been built over, or filled in so that a few more yards of space for building can be made, may still fill up in heavy rains – won’t they?

Again, engineers would have to chime in on this one. Perhaps my fears are unfounded, but we have had a sinking feeling (literally) when touring some of these properties.

Last but not least, there is the threat of a fire in these high-density developments. Does the Jamaica Fire Brigade have ladders and equipment to reach the top floor?

My sense is that many of these buildings, put up in a great hurry, are filling the demand for a more comfortable and convenient lifestyle. As we are thinking of downsizing, I fully understand this need.

However, I feel that we have already sacrificed so much: mature trees that have been removed and replaced by “landscaped” non-native trees; flowering shrubs – which are few and far between as there is no space for them; the accompanying biodiversity (don’t expect to see many birds!); friendly neighbours and neighbourhood networks, enhancing security; relative peace and quiet when relaxing at home; and even some “fresh” air – although Kingston’s air quality is poor, high rises deprive their inhabitants and their neighbours of both air and light.

Is this sensible, sustainable living, or just feeding the desire for that elusive “lifestyle” that we see every day on Instagram – carefully protected by high walls, security guards and coils of razor wire?

Sometimes I think we should be careful what we wish for…

And somehow, some day, we will need to reclaim our communities, even if they are changed beyond recognition.

If these issues and more regarding urbanisation in Jamaica concern you, you might like to follow Citizens Rights to the City, a grouping of 29 well-established citizens’ groups and neighbourhood associations – mostly in St. Andrew. You can find them on Twitter (sorry, “X”) @CitizensRightJA and on Instagram @citizensrightsja. Also on Facebook here. You can also expect to hear much more from the non-profit organisation Island City Lab, in the future; they are on social media too @islandcitylab.

Cranes, heavy trucks, destroyed road surfaces, noise, dust…all regular features of the St. Andrew landscape over the past few years.

15 thoughts on “Unsustainable living in St. Andrew, Jamaica

  1. Dust, dust, and more dust in the already polluted environment. In some of these areas where buildings are going up these were extremely fertile areas with an abundance of fruits these trees are gone. Replaced with concrete structures. I guess trees are not considered important. Trees give shade, cools the environment and buildings, so too does grass landscape it absorbs daytime heat. I feel there should be areas for people to relax and unwind in green spaces to go with these new high rises going up. It should be mandatory.

    Like

    1. I couldn’t agree more. The problem is that not only fruit trees, but some quite mature native trees are disappearing. They cannot be replaced easily. Yes, it should be mandatory. One important thing about trees (since you mention dust) is that they filter the air. We have major air quality issues in Kingston – not surprisingly, many Jamaicans in the city suffer from asthma, etc…

      Like

  2. These are issues which came to mind during my house hunt of last year too. I hated the prison like feel of the new apartments. In the end, I settled on an older house with some charm, a fixer upper but in a less trafficked part of Kingston with lots of trees and space. So far in 5 months, I’ve spotted 7 endemic species (6 birds and a galliwasp). I do hope the current wave of developments in Kingston take a greener turn soon. I will check out the pages you shared too. Best wishes in your house hunt!

    Like

    1. Dear Rochelle! What you have found sounds absolutely perfect. I am so glad you found an older house. We are so comfortable in ours and also with our tree-filled yard! At this point I feel that I don’t want to move, as I am so disturbed by what we have seen so far. However, we are older and do need somewhere that’s “manageable.” Apart from our personal situation, it’s the broader picture that worries me. We cannot keep covering the city with concrete, removing trees, building these monstrous edifices… And yes, some of the new places do feel like prisons indeed. Thanks for your comment.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Several ring tailed pigeons (they took a liking to my palm tree so I got to observe them every morning for a month), 2 of our hummingbirds and several woodpeckers. I am quite sure I spotted a tody as it was tiny and green with a red beak but it flew off faster than I could get a photo. I’m looking forward!

        Like

      2. Oh that’s wonderful! Ring-tailed Pigeons are SO beautiful and they do love the fruit of a particular palm trees. They are not very plentiful these days either. and yes, that sounds like a tody! How lovely!

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Your article “Unsustainable living in St Andrew” is hits the head on the nail. Please God, do not let this impending disaster become a reality

    Liked by 1 person

  4. As I started reading, some of the issues you raised came to mind as in need of exploration and investigation. I know that the developers are not necessarily fans of the environment, nor are their financers. These are capitalist projects to boot. But at least, if we are making Kingston a dreadful pretty place where you can collect Orlando rent we should proceed with our eyes wide open . You have opened the door to some enterprising reporting, Petchary.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.