Professor Brendan Bain: Here Is Some Clarity

This week, a great deal of controversy has erupted over the termination of Professor Brendan Bain from the Caribbean HIV/AIDS Regional Training Network (CHART) at the University of the West Indies, after a coalition of regional civil society groups expressed their discomfort over expert testimony he gave in a Belizean court recently. Much of the discussion in Jamaican media has been inflammatory and ill-informed. It is hoped that the following releases from the Caribbean Vulnerable Communities Coalition and its partners will help to clarify many of the issues that are under discussion.

I have also added the Statement from the University of the West Indies dated May 20, 2014 from its Marketing and Communications Office.

On a personal note, I hope that in the future issues such as child abuse, incest, rape, human trafficking and other serious social problems in Jamaica will generate as much heat as this has done. But somehow I doubt it.

Please read carefully. Thank you. (I highlighted a few phrases in bold, myself).

May 21, 2014

Letter to the Editor from Dr Carolyn Gomes, Executive Director of the Caribbean Vulnerable Communities Coalition

Dear Editor,

On behalf of over 30 diverse civil society groups across the region, the Caribbean Vulnerable Communities Coalition salutes the administration of the University of the West Indies (UWI) for preserving the University’s ability to continue to be a leader in the regional response to HIV, by insisting that those who lead its HIV initiatives are accountable to its principles and are advocates of sound public health.

In a release yesterday, UWI makes clear the reason it terminated its contractual arrangement with our colleague retired Prof. Brendan Bain’s to direct its Caribbean HIV/AIDS Regional Training Centre Network (CHART): “Professor Bain has lost the confidence and support of a significant sector of the community which the CHART programme is expected to reach, including the loss of his leadership status in PANCAP, thereby undermining the ability of this programme to effectively deliver on its mandate”. The University’s communiqué noted:

  • “The majority of HIV and public health experts believe that criminalising men having sex with men and discriminating against them violates their human rights, puts them at even higher risk, reduces their access to services, forces the HIV epidemic underground thereby increasing the HIV risk. These are the positions advocated by the UN, UNAIDS, WHO, PAHO, the international human rights communities and PANCAP (The Pan Caribbean Partnership against AIDS).”
  •  “in a high-profile case in Belize in which Caleb Orozco, a gay man in Belize, challenged the constitutionality of an 1861 law that criminalizes men having sex with men…Professor Brendan Bain provided a Statement on behalf of a group of churches seeking to retain the 1861 Law.”
  • “Many authorities familiar with the Brief presented believe that Professor Bain’s testimony supported arguments for retention of the law, thereby contributing to the continued criminalization and stigmatization of MSM.”

We are deeply troubled that public perception and reporting by responsible media houses continues to indicate that Prof. Bain was fired as a professor, and that this was for factual statements about the epidemiology of HIV. We also note that our colleague Prof. Bain provided his expert testimony not at the request of the state but a group of churches who intervened in the case in a way that has painfully polarized rational discourse about sexuality and citizenship across the Caribbean region.

We thank retired professor Brendan Bain, with whom many of us once worked productively and collegially for his acknowledged contributions to fighting HIV in the region, and we reaffirm our respect for his freedom to express his personal views in academic and other settings. It is not his right to have deeply held views that has been at issue, but the evident conflict of his action in the Belize court case with his capacity to represent UWI’s values in leading an HIV movement working for health and justice for all.

The University has been careful to note the hurt Prof. Bain’s advocacy has done to gay and lesbian persons in the Caribbean and to others in the region who are affected by discrimination and stigma. But that should not be misconstrued. His dismissal is no victory of anyone over anyone else. There is one Caribbean in which we all find ourselves— those who supported Prof. Bain, and the diverse groups who engaged CARICOM, UWI and others to point out that his continued leadership had become untenable and was damaging the University — a Caribbean we are committed to building. We share with the University a commitment to inclusion of everyone, in law, in health, in dignity. We are pleased that these principles have won over the notion of a region where some people’s humanity is inconvenient to others.

Professor Bain spoke no inconvenient truth in his testimony. The fact that men who have sex with men have significantly higher rates of HIV is widely known and acknowledged, and one reason for an urgent and more unified regional response. Where our colleague Prof. Bain erred was by linking without evidence those high HIV rates to the removal of laws that criminalize homosexuality in France, the Netherlands and United States, while ignoring that neither laws nor Jamaica’s notorious hostility to homosexuality have protected us from having one of the highest rates of HIV infection among men who have sex with men in the world.

As another colleague and epidemiologist Chris Beyrer wrote in the Jamaica Gleaner last year, “People who are afraid and feel threatened avoid health care, do not seek or get HIV testing or other services which can help reduce risks, and are less likely to be treated for HIV if they are living with the virus. Punitive and hostile policies do not reduce HIV risks – they increase them.” There is broad public health consensus that, rather than retaining laws that punish some and increase HIV risks, we make the region safer for all by “making condoms and lubricants widely available and cheap, by treating STI in settings of dignity, safety, and quality of care, so that people at risk will seek and use the services they need. We also do so by listening to patients, being non-judgmental, and helping them reduce their real risks -which they will not disclose if they are afraid.”

Prof. Bain not only undermined this position in his testimony. He did so in ways that damaged the University’s reputation, lacked professional forethought, and betrayed the mission of the UWI unit he was asked to lead — “to strengthen the capacity of national health-care personnel and systems to provide access to quality HIV & AIDS prevention, care, treatment, and support services for all Caribbean people”. We need strong, credible UWI leadership in the regional epidemic. Keeping our colleague Prof. Bain in that leadership role would cost us all.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Carolyn Gomes

Executive Director of the Caribbean Vulnerable Communities Coalition

Q&A regarding the termination of Professor Bain

Following the statement put out by the University of the West Indies announcing Professor Brendan Bain’s termination from the Caribbean HIV/AIDS Regional Training Network (CHART), we as civil society groups wish to recognize the principled leadership of professors within the university who have demonstrated their opposition to any form of discrimination and their commitment to ensuring human rights for all citizens.

We would like to take this opportunity to clarify some important questions being raised about human rights and public health, especially regarding the health of men who have sex with men and the leadership in the Caribbean HIV response.

What does the public health science say about homosexuality, buggery laws and HIV?

There is an authoritative global body of science supporting the removal of punitive laws which criminalize sex between consenting men, accepted by the UN, UNAIDS, WHO, the Pan Caribbean Partnership against HIV and AIDS, and the Johns Hopkins School of Human Rights and Public Health, among many other important academic institutions and global agencies. Criminalizing laws can intimidate MSM, leading them to avoid healthcare out of fear of arrest or threats of violence.

The research that Professor Bain cites in his witness statement was produced by various scientists and then published in the respected scientific journal The Lancet in 2012. It is not his own work; Professor Bain has no published research on the issue. The studies all show that legal barriers complicate the delivery of HIV prevention and that policies which criminalize homosexuality, notably in the Caribbean, are associated with increased prevalence of HIV infection in black MSM.

The same research culminates by making a series of recommendations, including the decriminalization of same-sex sexual relations and targeted programs to reduce homophobia. It shows that even the best biomedical and behavior change interventions fail without spaces in which men can safely seek care and services and communicate openly about their sexual lives. To suggest the science supports retention of colonial buggery laws is misrepresentation and misuse of the information.

It is for this reason that Caribbean civil society groups working in HIV, including networks of people living with HIV, gender advocates, and public health agencies, are encouraged by the Orozco & UNIBAM litigation. Criminalizing laws are a significant contributor to increased HIV risk for MSM and the research tells us to remove them.

Are gay men more at risk of becoming infected with HIV or not?

Yes. A combination of biological and structural factors put men who have sex with men (MSM) at higher risk for HIV. The two regions in the world with the highest rates of HIV infection are Sub-Sahara Africa and the Caribbean. For example, 33% of Jamaican and 20% of Trinidadian MSM live with HIV. Our region also has the most unsupportive legal framework for addressing the HIV and AIDS epidemic compared with any other region in the world, according to the Harvard School of Public Health. Criminalization of MSM and high HIV prevalence are intrinsically related.

What about freedom of expression?

If the HIV and AIDS epidemic has taught us anything, it is that respect for all people’s human rights is critical. Everyone has the right to the freedom of expression and different points of view. In open societies, people may and do disapprove of homosexuality. Yet people who choose to take leadership positions in the response to HIV should not expect to express views in direct opposition to accepted science and best practice and continue to retain the confidence of the communities they are meant to benefit and of regional actors in the response to HIV. This is a conflict of interest.

On Professor Bain

Professor Bain is a good man who has worked in the field of HIV for many years. He was not fired as a Professor, he is retired. His contract with CHART was terminated. UWI’s statement said, “Professor Bain has lost the confidence and support of a significant sector of the community which the CHART program is expected to reach, including the loss of his leadership status in PANCAP, thereby undermining the ability of this program to effectively deliver on its mandate.”

The role of UWI in the regional response to HIV

The CHART Program has a mandate to strengthen healthcare professionals and systems to provide quality HIV prevention, care and treatment and support for all Caribbean people. It has a critical role in ensuring that MSM can access services without stigma and discrimination from healthcare professionals. We believe this program can be maximized in the hands of strong leadership. The University of the West Indies Faculty Group of Public Law Teachers also makes a critical contribution to the regional response and to promoting human rights. We will continue to work closely with UWI to develop stronger responses to HIV in the Caribbean, especially for those most vulnerable to HIV infection.

Who are we?

Civil society’s role in the HIV epidemic is critical in developing strong community systems for front-line responses to HIV. This is recognized globally. We are a diverse civil society group formed of groups of people living with HIV, women, civil liberties groups, as well as LGBT people. We came together to protect strong, credible UWI leadership in the regional epidemic.

Statement regarding Termination of Contractual Arrangement with Professor Brendan Bain as Director of CHART

Posted: May 20, 2014

The University of the West Indies sees its role as providing higher education and increasing capacity of the human resources of the region it serves, conducting and publishing research and helping to guide public policy on issues relevant to social and economic development. The academic community plays a pivotal role in carrying out the University’s mandate and is encouraged to engage in public dialogue on matters of national and regional import. The UWI therefore affirms the right of academics to communicate their views based on their work and expertise and in so doing to render public service.

For the last year, there has been considerable controversy surrounding the appropriateness of Professor Brendan Bain serving as Director of CHART. Professor Bain is a retired member of staff of The University of the West Indies who has had a distinguished career primarily in the field of HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean. In June 2001, the CARICOM Secretariat proposed the creation of a Caribbean HIV/AIDS Regional Training (CHART) Centre and two years later the CHART Network was established “for the purpose of contributing to systematic capacity development among institutional and community-based healthcare workers involved in prevention of HIV/AIDS and in care, treatment and support of persons living with HIV and AIDS”.

Professor Brendan Bain has been the Director of CHART since its inception and after his retirement from The UWI in 2013 he was given a two-year post-retirement contract to continue in his role as Director. CHART is not a department of the UWI but a regional project managed by the University under a contract funded by the President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR), the Global Fund and a group of US agencies, to train health workers dealing with patients and communities affected by HIV/AIDS.

The issue in question arose about two years ago in a high-profile case in Belize in which Caleb Orozco, a gay man in Belize, challenged the constitutionality of an 1861 law that criminalises men having sex with men (MSM). Professor Brendan Bain provided a Statement on behalf of a group of churches seeking to retain the 1861 Law. Many authorities familiar with the Brief presented believe that Professor Bain’s testimony supported arguments for retention of the law, thereby contributing to the continued criminalisation and stigmatisation of MSM. This opinion is shared by the lesbian, gay and other groups who are served by CHART.

The majority of HIV and public health experts believe that criminalising men having sex with men and discriminating against them violates their human rights, puts them at even higher risk, reduces their access to services, forces the HIV epidemic underground thereby increasing the HIV risk. These are the positions advocated by the UN, UNAIDS, WHO, PAHO, the international human rights communities and PANCAP (The Pan Caribbean Partnership against AIDS) which is the organisation leading the regional response to the HIV epidemic.

While the University recognises the right of Professor Bain to provide expert testimony in the manner he did, it has become increasingly evident that Professor Bain has lost the confidence and support of a significant sector of the community which the CHART programme is expected to reach, including the loss of his leadership status in PANCAP, thereby undermining the ability of this programme to effectively deliver on its mandate. It is for this reason that the University of the West Indies has decided to terminate the contract of Professor Bain as Director of the Regional Coordinating Unit (RCU) of the Caribbean HIV/Training (CHART) Network.

See attached excerpt from the Chancellor’s 2013 Graduation Address


I have heard activists complain that scholarship and practice need to come together more closely, that the teaching and the discourse around moral, philosophical and constitutional niceties do not relate to the daily infringements suffered by minorities in our societies.

It is in this context that I wish to refer to the negation of human rights of a specific minority in our Caribbean societies. Professor Rose-Marie Antoine and I have just published a book “HIV and Human Rights” which resulted from a Symposium held at Cave Hill 3 years ago. This brought out clearly the degree of stigma and discrimination against persons living with HIV/AIDS and minorities such as homosexuals and many were appalled to know that eleven of our CARICOM countries are the only ones in the Western Hemisphere which still have laws on their books that criminalise consensual homosexual sex in private. Their presence is a clear indication of the disjuncture between the criminal codes and the principles of respect for human dignity and essential freedoms enshrined in the Caribbean constitutions.

They are a reflection of the savings law clause which, as written and understood, insulates laws which were in existence at the time of independence from constitutional challenge. We should note that they are relics of British laws of 1876, and Britain has long repealed such law. Of course, Parliaments if so inclined could amend or repeal these laws by an ordinary majority. However, given the difficulty of parliamentary action, the only recourse for change is through litigation.

It is sometimes suggested that these laws are not enforced and therefore pose no problem, but the evidence is clear that they contribute to the stigma and discrimination suffered by lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender persons. Not only is such stigma and discrimination inimical to the public health efforts to prevent and control HIV, but they affront the basic rights which are enshrined in the constitutions of our countries.

Given Sir Philip’s injunction that as an institution we should be concerned with the elimination of prejudice, I ask what our University does in this field. I am aware of the programs in human rights which are well supported. But is the culture of our institution such that there is intolerance of intolerance and the infringement of the rights of minorities? Should our institution simply be a reflection of the prejudices of the rest of the community or should it by precept and word speak to the injustice that attends the negation of human rights of a minority? Should it be a leaven of change in the bodies politic?

I am pleased that the Faculty of Law has been proactive in this regard, mixing scholarship with practice and has formed a Rights Advocacy Project whose main objective is “to promote human rights and social justice in the Caribbean through pivotal public interest litigation and related activities of legal and social science research on the situation relating to human rights in the Caribbean and public education”. As I understand it, two of their major efforts now are in relation to the denial of human rights to a specific minority, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. I wish them well and trust that their work gets widely known throughout the University. I think that if Sir Philip were here now fifty years later, he would be proud of this work.





29 thoughts on “Professor Brendan Bain: Here Is Some Clarity

  1. my name is Armanda
    this is real take it serious, who will believe that a herb can cure HIV in my body, i never believe that this will work i have spend a lot when getting drugs from the hospital to keep me healthy, what i was waiting for is death because i was broke, one day i hard about this great man who is well know of HIV and cancer cure, i decided to email him, unknowingly to me that this will be the end of the HIV aids in my body, he prepare the herb for me, and give me instruction on how to take it, at the end of the two week, he told me to go to the hospital for a check up, and i went, surprisingly after the test the doctor confirm me negative, i thought it was a joke, i went to other hospital was also negative, then i took my friend who was also HIV positive to the Dr, after the treatment she was also confirm negative . He also have the herb to cure cancer please i want every one with this virus to be free, that is why am dropping his email address, ( do email him he is a great man. think you for saving my life, and I promise I will always testify for your good work thank you dr olufa for your help to me.


  2. You will agree that the best expert in this business is the true and living Creator who is not going anywhere. He is here forever and He says that that lifestyle is abominable. Do not defend this way of life. It is totally unproductive. Whether it is done privately by two consenting adults, it is still a human wrong. God defines what is wrong. HIV is a thief of life.


    1. Thank you for your comments. No, I will not agree that God is an expert on HIV and he does not define right and wrong for me (how does that work actually, I wonder?) I decide that for myself! Like many other people in this world, I do not believe in your God. But I did think Christians were supposed to be compassionate. Instead I see them pointing fingers and passing judgment on people. I don’t think your Jesus would approve of that, would he? May I correct you on one thing: Homosexuality is not a “way of life.” It is something you are born with. However, fundamentalist Christians like yourself would want to believe otherwise. I wish you all the best.


  3. Ive read a lot of opinions about this Bain issue and it reminds me how much is at stake with this gay rights debate. Lets talk str8 for a change. The UWI did bow to Gay activists in firing Prof Bain. The Gay activists said that Prof Bain actions were in conflict of interest with his position as head of Chart. So lets say this is so. Why did the UWI not fire him for this conflict of interest. The UWI said they terminated the man because he had lost the support of majority of the group the Chart programme caters for. So lets buy this argument again. My limited reading suggests that chart caters to the entire population so if homosexual community make up less than 2 percent how is that majority. U see none of these arguments makes any sense to me. Sounds like the prof was left to hang dry by the UWI. We all know the buggrey law has had no significant impact on the rights of gay community to exercise they right to have sex . In fact heterosexuals also engage in anal sex so they too are penalised by the provision of buggrey law. So in essence no anal loving person can say they are not free to have their anal loving activites in their private corridors. So therefore one must question why these groups are so hell bent on having the buggrey law repealed. I suggest the aim is to have same sex union legalized. We see through the facade. We must not let they try to pull wool over our eyes.I hope we dont get to point as in countries in canada where pastors are sued for quoting what the bible says about homosexuals. I hope we dont get to the point as in america where persons are fired because they contributed to efforts to keep same sex unions from becoming legal. Oops i guess we are somewhat at this point.. Lets pray that Good sense may prevail and that we go no further down this road.Lets pray that the Lord will grant justice and strength perseve Prof Bain and his family in this time. Lets pray for our brothers and sisters who are trapped in this homosexual lifestyle. Lets pray for the church that we may not join the mob in hurling stones at anyone but we instead act in a spirit of love and compassion as Jesus did with all of us. Lets pray for discernment and wisdom for all our leaders. Lets pray for Ja land we love.


    1. Thank you for your comments. I prefer to read facts, rather than opinions. This “controversy” is not about people’s religious beliefs, or whether people like gays or not. It is about the fight against HIV/AIDS, and what will be the most effective way to work to reduce the unacceptably high levels in Jamaica; this means working primarily with vulnerable and marginalized groups, including men who have sex with men (MSM). The stigma and discrimination against people living with HIV and AIDS still exists in many areas of society, and discrimination against the LGBT community is widespread and well documented. So this is a “double whammy.” Having been involved with this fight for quite a few years myself, I should point out that the emphasis has moved (some time ago) to targeting these vulnerable groups in the fight against HIV and AIDS (and, I should point out, the Jamaican Ministry of Health has been very much on board with this for years, also. It has collaborated with J-FLAG on a number of programs, including recently training for medical personnel). It sounds as if you have been swayed by the “them vs. us” approach that much (but not all) of the local media has taken. Everybody has an opinion, but very few people have taken any interest at all in the struggle to reduce HIV/AIDS cases in Jamaica, which continues. Now suddenly because the so-called “gay lobby” has been mentioned, everyone has become an opinionated “expert” on all the complex social issues related to the disease. And guess what? The real experts, such as the Pan Caribbean Partnership on HIV/AIDS (you can find their statement posted on my blog) actually do know best. But of course, we would rather listen to those who express their religion-influenced opinions the loudest.


  4. My comment CVC has learned doublespeak – the language of the oppressors — well. It’ either he has your support and a job, or he does not. No two ways about it. With half-hearted support like that, no one needs enemies.


    1. It is certainly not “doublespeak” and Prof Bain is perfectly entitled to his views of course. No one is oppressing anyone, not “them” vs “us” (as local media has been quick to characterize it).
      It is simply a conflict of interest. Everyone is entitled to freedom of speech and no one’s freedom of speech is being threatened, come to that… Simply that expressing his private opinions in that context and in his position is a conflict, based on his public duty and responsibility.


  5. The people of Belize is against changing the law at this time when we can see the increase in MNS/Lesbians and the increase in health issues like AIDS, SYPHILIS, WART, gonorrhea, cancer and many new sicknesses that are either contagious or deadly. Canada, England and USA have seen dramatic increase in the above.


    1. The increase in STDs has been linked to changes in human sexual behavior, including sexual activity at a much younger age when humans are more vulnerable/susceptible to STDs – especially women – and poorer health-seeking practices, especially among low-income populations. Increases have been especially marked in women and young teens. In the UK they are especially concerned about the increase among over-50s. This is not to say that MSMs are not affected too, but there are other social trends impacting these increases. And how is retaining the law in Belize going to reduce these trends, exactly?


  6. The issue in question did not arose about two years ago in a high-profile in Belize, but actually a little less than a year ago, and it is since then then that the LGBT started targeting him.


    1. Yes, I am actually aware of that as I have worked in this field for quite a few years, but I do not believe he was “targeted.” He simply had a duty to the communities that he primarily served as head of CHART. It is like the head of an organization advocating for (for example) indigenous populations in Brazil testifying in court that, in his opinion and because of his religious beliefs, he believes that laws against them should remain in place. He is perfectly entitled to his opinion, but surely could not remain as head of the organization that serves a specific community (and Jamaican Government policy also focuses very much on the LGBT community and other vulnerable populations in its work in HIV/AIDS) in this case.


  7. In the United States, which do not have the law they want to change in Belize, in 2008 – 2010 there was a 22% increase HIV new cases in MSM between the age 15 – 24. 74% was black men, 20% Hispanic, and 20% whites. By the end of 2010 a total of 11,413 of those new case died from AIDS. Despite all efforts and millions of dollars being pumped into research it is still not going down.


    1. Jamaica and the Caribbean are not the United States. (Funny how we like to compare ourselves with our “neighbors to the north” when it suits us, and dismiss them when it doesn’t).


  8. Thanks for this. It has helped me explain more clearly to some who were most upset by Prof Bain’s dismissal, why I was not upset by it , but rather was upset about Prof’s testimonial.


  9. Correct or most expedient decision?

    What was the stated mission of CHART?

    Could the head of Alcohol Anonymous say that that Alcohol is bad and probably should be banned and made illegal? Should he be fired then?


  10. Thank you all for putting ALL the FACTS out for the public to learn.

    UWI made the correct decision.

    Respect to all concerned for the diligent work on HIV/AIDS and let us all continue to work together for human rights, human dignity and healthy happy lives for all our caribbean people.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.