Tag Archives: Nobel Prize

African Postman: A Great South African Scientist and Humanitarian

Professor Phillip Tobias

Professor Phillip Tobias with hominid skull fossils from east and southern Africa (Photo credit: Chris Kirchhoff/Media Club SA)

Former president of South Africa Thabo Mbeki said at the funeral of Professor Phillip Tobias that his legacy was “too important and too durable to be forgotten.”  Professor Emeritus at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, Tobias died on June 7 at the age of 86. Many dignitaries, including President Jacob Zuma, attended his funeral at Johannesburg‘s Jewish cemetery.  Why was he so revered? He was so much more than an academic, who was nominated for the Nobel Prize three times. Yes, he was a paleoanthropologist; he unearthed the mysteries of man’s origins in ground-breaking and remarkable ways.  In 2008, a colleague (his protege, Lee Berger) discovered Australopithecus sediba in the Malapa cave, in the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site; these fossil remains date back two million years and appear to be the closest to our homo ancestors yet discovered. Professor Tobias reportedly became very emotional at the thought that these earliest ancestors of man were found in his beloved country of South Africa.

His dedication to science (he also studied genetics and medicine) is just one aspect of the professor’s life and achievements. He was also greatly admired for his stance against apartheid in the early days.  He did not come from a privileged background; his family was almost destitute after his father’s business failed. He had many challenges in his early years – and later in his academic year, when he had some detractors. But he overcame. He never married or had children, but was devoted to his students at Wits Medical School in Durban, where he became head of Anatomy in 1951 – and to all his thousands of students throughout his life.

And it was at Wits that Phillip Tobias took a strong and furious stance against apartheid, during the six and a half years when Daniel Francois Malan put in place legislation that laid the foundations of the apartheid regime.  Below is a marvelous article from South Africa’s first daily tablet newspaper, iMaverick, which you might like to subscribe to.  I highlighted Professor Tobias’ views on race from the viewpoint of a scientist and social activist.  I was also struck by his love of the newness of science and learning (“We have to swallow hard and open our minds”) and his eloquent defense of the university as the oppressive forces of apartheid literally hovered overhead.  You can read it at http://allafrica.com/stories/201206081399.html.

Johannesburg — A man with a twinkle in his eye, who lived for his science and his students, the man who bravely fought the apartheid machine, has died. What lives on is his remarkable legacy in the fields of palaeoanthropology, genetics, medicine and humanitarianism.

It is hard to think of Emeritus Professor Phillip Valentine Tobias as dead. He was a man who was so brilliantly alive. Two years ago, when he was 85, Tobias spoke to Sunday Times about death: “Retirement is the kiss of death. I still come to the office most days, but as you can see there’s no computer on my desk. I officially retired from my chair of anatomy after 30 years at the end of 1990, then immediately took up another three years – and then retired in the sense that they no longer paid me.”

But during the last few months of his life, Tobias battled with ill health and finally succumbed in hospital at midday on Thursday. He was revered around the world. Tobias completed a medical BSc and lectured at Wits Medical School before getting his doctorates in medicine, palaeoanthropology and genetics. An honorary doctorate at Cambridge University followed, and in 1959 he became head of anatomy at the Wits medical school. He succeeded his friend, mentor and teacher Raymond Dart, who earned fame for discovering the “Taung” skull, a species he claimed to be an evolutionary “bridge” between apes and humans. Tobias studied genetics with Dart, who cultivated in his student a great love of palaeoanthropology. But the man, who was to become one the world’s most respected experts on human evolution, first started thinking about humans’ ancestors as a child who loved to read comic books.

The Chicago Tribune tells of how Tobias was engrossed by cave-man comics that portrayed Neanderthals as stooped brutes. “They had the spark divine in their heads, but they were bent over in appallingly bad posture,” Tobias told the Tribune. “That was the view then, that we became human in our brains before we became human in our posture and our teeth,” said the octogenarian who saw many paradigms in the study of ancient humans overturned during his time. “We have to swallow hard and open our minds – I’ve always loved changes of paradigm, and we are living on the brink of big ones at this moment. I’m very excited. I don’t think we’re 50% of the way toward resolving the outstanding questions of human origins,” said Tobias before warning that not being open to new ideas in his field could lead to rapid “cerebral fossilisation”.

Though Tobias is legendary for unearthing man’s ancient ancestry, back home it was his huge regard for humanity and his active struggle against Apartheid that made him a true son of the South African soil. Born in Durban on 14 October 1925, Tobias moved to Johannesburg to study science and medicine at Wits University a few years before the dark shroud of apartheid started to become a legislated evil. “Only a few years after I arrived here, the Apartheid regime came to power under DF Malan and they won that fateful election on an Apartheid platform. Every branch of society was to be segregated. Discrimination was to be enforced between the haves and the have-nots, between black and white South Africans,” Tobias said when he received the Walter Sisulu Special Contribution Award in 2007.

At the time, Tobias described how universities like Wits faced the threat of government-enforced segregation.

“Immediately, I took action. NUSAS, the National Union of South African Students, which had been non-racial – or ‘multiracial’ as the Americans preferred to call it – elected me president in July 1948, only a few months after the apartheid regime had assumed office.” In 1949, Tobias and his colleagues would launch what he called SA’s first anti-apartheid campaign. “In the beginning, it was a campaign to fight against the threat that apartheid be imposed on the universities. Over the years, it expanded its remit so as to oppose all other moves to impose segregation and grand apartheid on every sector of society.”

Tobias told of how Special Branch police would invade Wits repeatedly to fire teargas at students and staff. Helicopters whirred overhead to spy on students, but served another purpose as their noisy engines drowned out dissenting speeches.The three-time Nobel Prize nominee would rage against the apartheid machine throughout its existence, and in 1987 this would see him face off against then minister of education, FW de Klerk.

The New York Times reported that thousands of university students rallied against political conditions that the government of the time was trying to install, in order to get these institutions of higher learning to toe the party line.

Universities were supposed to report on misconduct by anti-apartheid activists in a “spy for subsidies” blackmail type scheme that was cooked up by the PW Botha regime. Universities were to agree to hand over information to De Klerk within weeks in return for subsidies. “‘We shall not subjugate ourselves to these savage conditions,” Tobias told cheering students and academics. “We shall not prostitute our calling as academics to become a spying and policing agency. This university will not become a tool of repression.”

The New York Times wrote: “At Witwatersrand University, lecturers wearing academic gowns formed a human chain to protect militant black students from police action, and white professors held hands with black university workers wearing overalls.”

Sign erected at University of Witwatersrand by students on Tobias' death

Sign erected at University of Witwatersrand by students on Tobias’ death, with flags at half-staff (Photo from Wits Vuvuzela Student Newspaper)

Tobias once explained why he raged against Apartheid. “You may perhaps wonder: why should I have all this scientific mumbo-jumbo thrust on to me? It is of nobody’s concern what I believe about the expanding universe or the atomic theory. Why therefore should I concern myself with the scientific theory of race?

“The answer is that these other terms and concepts are emotionally and politically neutral; the term ‘race’, on the other hand, is heavily charged emotionally and politically and full of unsound and even dangerous meanings. It is in the name of ‘race’ that millions of people have been murdered and millions of others are being held in degradation.

That is why you cannot afford to remain ignorant about ‘race’.

“In a society in which the question of race has come to loom as largely as it does in South Africa, there is, I believe, a positive duty on a scientist who has made a special study of race to make known the facts and the most highly confirmed hypotheses about race, whenever a suitable opportunity presents itself. I should be failing, therefore, in my academic duty, if I were to hold my peace and say nothing about race, simply because the scientific truth about race runs counter to some or all of the assumptions underlying or influencing the race policies of this country. In no field is the need of guidance from qualified scientists more imperative than in this very subject of race,” Tobias said, then in his 70s.

A gentleman, great academic, revered teacher, prolific publisher and much-loved human being, Tobias still speaks to us. “Even when things appear to be at their worst, always look for the positive. I felt very strongly about Apartheid and fought strongly against it, starting the first anti-Apartheid movement at Wits. I always felt it would change, it was inevitable. I don’t feel any particular grievance or grumpiness about the state of things. I’m an eternal optimist and have every hope that things are going to come right.”

And his advice to those of us still studying or learning about life?

“‘Never lose your sense of wonderment,’ I have repeatedly said. On the other side of the coin, how sad I have felt, and how sympathetic, when I have been confronted, happily not often, with a student who is blasé, uninterested, beset with a closed mind. Such people are a challenge to the teacher and to the idealist, and when both are combined, as in myself, when the mentor is brimming with an overwhelming sense of wonder, it is doubly challenging…The retention of my personal sense of wonderment and of enthusiasm has, I feel sure, played a big part throughout my life.”

Professor Tobias explains

Professor Tobias explains, teaches and enlightens a group of dignitaries.

Tobias the man is no longer with us, but his massive intellect, work and wisdom remain with us forever.

iMaverick is South Africa’s first daily tablet newspaper and includes coverage from the Daily Maverick and Free African Media. To subscribe, go to: www.imaverick.co.za.


Attendees at Professor Tobias' funeral on June 11

Attendees at Professor Tobias’ funeral on June 11

African Postman: Concern, Protests over South African “Secrecy Bill”

National Security” has always been a hot-button issue globally, especially in the past decade or so since 9/11.  Now, the issue has surfaced in South Africa – which since the fall of apartheid has been seen as a beacon of democracy on the African continent.  The new Protection of State Information Bill is the source of great controversy, with two Nobel Prize-winning authors, journalists, human rights and civil society activists joining in protest.  Is this the thin end of the wedge, the beginning of the whittling-away of civil rights, access to information and freedom of expression?  South Africa’s Constitution is considered one of the most enlightened and progressive in the world.  Does this law threaten some aspects of it, and encourage corruption?

These are serious issues that are – or should be – also of concern to Jamaican civil society.  So far as I know, the Official Secrets Act is still firmly in place on our island.

Today’s article is reprinted from the Guardian UK website: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/06/south-african-campaigners-secrecy-bill

Secrecy laws planned for South Africa fundamentally threaten free speech and investigative journalism, and could have a chilling effect on the rest of Africa, a united front of human rights lawyers, newspaper editors and Nobel prize-winning writers have warned in interviews with the Guardian.

 Nadine Gordimer

Nobel-Prize winning author and anti-apartheid campaigner Nadine Gordimer

The protection of state information bill – dubbed the “secrecy bill” – envisages draconian penalties of up to 25 years in prison for whistleblowers and journalists who possess, leak or publish state secrets. It has been described as the first piece of legislation since the end of apartheid in 1994 to undermine South Africa’s democracy.

Opponents of the bill fear that, with South Africa often regarded as a beacon of democracy and freedom on the continent, it could be used as an excuse by repressive African regimes for renewed crackdowns on journalists and activists.

Among those to attack the proposed legislation is JM Coetzee, the Nobel laureate and double Booker prize winner, making a rare public intervention.

“The legislation is transparently intended to make life difficult for pesky investigative journalists, and generally to save incompetent or corrupt bureaucrats from being embarrassed,” Coetzee, born in Cape Town but now resident in Australia, said in an email. “Its sponsors have very likely been emboldened by the push that has taken place all over the western world since 2001 to erect a wall of secrecy around the more dubious actions of the state, and to make it a crime to breach that wall.”

Coetzee joins fellow Nobel laureate Nadine Gordimer in calling global attention to measures they believe are calculated to help the government conceal evidence of corruption. Gordimer, whose books were banned under white minority rule, said: “It is quite obvious why this bill has come about – the government is making no attempt to hide the truth that its intention is to aid the cover-up of corruption.

JM Coetzee

JM Coetzee, Nobel Prize-winning writer

“I wrote during the apartheid regime and I fought against the apartheid regime. Three of my books were banned. What we are doing now is going back to apartheid censorship under a new guise.”

Today, South Africa boasts arguably the freest press in Africa, with no shortage of revelations about shady deals or satirical cartoons lampooning politicians’ foibles. Freedom of expression, including freedom of the press and other media, has been protected under the constitution. But opponents of the bill believe the gains of the past 18 years are under threat and warn that the rest of the continent is watching. In neighbouring Zimbabwe, journalists continue to be harassed and arrested, while state broadcasters remain firmly under President Robert Mugabe’s control.

Andrew Feinstein, a former African National Congress (ANC) MP whose exposure of a corrupt multibillion-pound arms deal might have resulted in his prosecution under the new laws, said: “I think that if this democracy continues to weaken – and I believe it has over the past few years – there is no doubt that that has a knock-on effect, because I think for many countries in Africa the comparison is always made with South Africa as this bright shining star of democracy. If that comparison no longer holds, it lets a lot of other countries off the hook in many ways.”

Nic Dawes, editor of South Africa’s Mail & Guardian newspaper, said: “We’re already hearing from people elsewhere on the continent that their politicians and government officials are saying to them: ‘You see, they’re even doing this in South Africa, so there’s no reason why we shouldn’t be doing it here.’

“That’s one of the most dangerous things about the bill: the excuse it will give to other countries elsewhere in the region, that had been opening up, to begin to tip in the other direction. It’s really very disturbing.”

South Africa, in turn, is feeling the repercussions of the phone hacking saga and debate over press regulation in Britain, Dawes added. “Almost every time that I have a discussion with someone about either the protection of state information bill or the ANC’s proposals for statutory media regulation, the British phone hacking scandal is brought up as an example of why these kinds of moves are necessary.”

Mail and Guardian

The Mail and Guardian newspaper in South Africa

The governing ANC defends the bill as a necessary update to laws made 30 year ago during apartheid. The party claims it will tighten national security and is not aimed at the media. The bill is under review by South Africa’s parliament and, following pressure from activists, has already been subject to many revisions.

But hopes of a climbdown on the bill were dashed on Wednesday when the state security department rejected amendments proposed by the ANC. Dennis Dlomo, the department’s acting director general, rejected calls to limit the power of the ministry to delegate classification powers, reduce penalties and limit the heavy onus placed on the accused.

Dlomo also shrugged off pressure from campaigners to include a public interest defence clause, saying: “They want a post-disclosure test of public interest. We want a pre-disclosure test. The last point on this is really simple. What if a whistleblower gives away top secret, legitimately classified information?”

In response Alf Lees, an MP for the main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, asked: “The department surely does not want to create the impression that it wishes to protect alleged criminals or punish those who earnestly expose corrupt and criminal behaviour?”

Keeping up pressure for reform is vital, according to the civil society alliance Right2Know, which has organised protests against the bill. Murray Hunter, one of its coordinators, said: “The secrecy bill has united people across the boundaries of space, race, class and ideology – from leafy suburbs to townships and informal settlements, shop floors and office blocks, university campuses and old-age homes. We can’t stop pushing now; in fact, now’s the time to start.”

We must be vigilant and defend our democracy, if we happen to be living in one. It can be eroded so very easily.



 

Dennis Dlomo

Dennis Dlomo took over the powerful State Security Agency earlier this year.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,907 other followers

%d bloggers like this: